Search results

  1. B

    [In-goal] Warming up players in-goal

    Paul Dobson: http://www.rugby365.com/laws-referees/law-discussions/78623-law-discussion-subs-on-the-field
  2. B

    [In-goal] Warming up players in-goal

    Paul Dobson: http://www.rugby365.com/laws-referees/law-discussions/78623-law-discussion-subs-on-the-field
  3. B

    [In-goal] Warming up players in-goal

    Surely Law 3.2 applies
  4. B

    [In-goal] Warming up players in-goal

    Surely Law 3.2 applies
  5. B

    [Law] Compelling evidence?

    On field decision was No Try. TMO said that there was compelling evidence that the ball was grounded. From the clip it seems the ball was grounded but the camera view is obscured by the defender's arm. Which is why I posted this and asked the question as it seems that "compelling evidence" is...
  6. B

    [Law] Compelling evidence?

    On field decision was No Try. TMO said that there was compelling evidence that the ball was grounded. From the clip it seems the ball was grounded but the camera view is obscured by the defender's arm. Which is why I posted this and asked the question as it seems that "compelling evidence" is...
  7. B

    [Law] Compelling evidence?

    During the Stormers vs Lions Super Rugby game yesterday the TMO "awarded" a try saying "there is compelling evidence that the ball was grounded" "Compelling evidence" was a term I haven't heard used before. What is meant by "compelling evidence" and how does that compare to "clear and obvious"?
  8. B

    [Law] Compelling evidence?

    During the Stormers vs Lions Super Rugby game yesterday the TMO "awarded" a try saying "there is compelling evidence that the ball was grounded" "Compelling evidence" was a term I haven't heard used before. What is meant by "compelling evidence" and how does that compare to "clear and obvious"?
  9. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    I was going to remove the "chop" part but was already logged out. A chop tackle is essentially a no arms tackle, isn't it? Merely one aimed at the legs? Still interested to know why Ian_Cook felt the tackle wasn't a "dangerous tackle"
  10. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    I was going to remove the "chop" part but was already logged out. A chop tackle is essentially a no arms tackle, isn't it? Merely one aimed at the legs? Still interested to know why Ian_Cook felt the tackle wasn't a "dangerous tackle"
  11. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    I'm not with you. Are you saying that the tackle didn't fulfil the requirements for a dangerous tackle (no arms chop tackle and tackled player going past horizontal) or that in this instance it didn't turn out to be dangerous?
  12. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    I'm not with you. Are you saying that the tackle didn't fulfil the requirements for a dangerous tackle (no arms chop tackle and tackled player going past horizontal) or that in this instance it didn't turn out to be dangerous?
  13. B

    [RWC] Rankings and the RWC 2019 draw

    Ireland beating England doesn't change the rankings of either team. However, Italy beating Scotland (which I didn't consider) will drop Scotland down to around 9th, if it's by more that 15 to below Argentina at 79.18
  14. B

    [RWC] Rankings and the RWC 2019 draw

    Ireland beating England doesn't change the rankings of either team. However, Italy beating Scotland (which I didn't consider) will drop Scotland down to around 9th, if it's by more that 15 to below Argentina at 79.18
  15. B

    [RWC] Rankings and the RWC 2019 draw

    Some permutations: England, Wales win <15 1 New Zealand 94.78 2 England 91.02 (91.54) 3 Australia 86.35 4(6) Wales 82.16 (83.30) 5(4) Ireland 83.18 (82.66) 6(5) Scotland 82.18 7 South Africa 81.79 8(9) Argentina 79.91 9(8) France 80.57 (79.43) England, France win <15 1 New Zealand 94.78 2...
  16. B

    [RWC] Rankings and the RWC 2019 draw

    Some permutations: England, Wales win <15 1 New Zealand 94.78 2 England 91.02 (91.54) 3 Australia 86.35 4(6) Wales 82.16 (83.30) 5(4) Ireland 83.18 (82.66) 6(5) Scotland 82.18 7 South Africa 81.79 8(9) Argentina 79.91 9(8) France 80.57 (79.43) England, France win <15 1 New Zealand 94.78 2...
  17. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    Suspended for 1 week
  18. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    Suspended for 1 week
  19. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    Two offences deemed to be not serious, only mistimed - Penalty only https://youtu.be/9Ar9enc9J_4 Sanchez was subsequently cited for the "mistimed" jump
  20. B

    Nicholas Sanchez's "mistimed" offences

    Two offences deemed to be not serious, only mistimed - Penalty only https://youtu.be/9Ar9enc9J_4 Sanchez was subsequently cited for the "mistimed" jump