Search results

Just to clarify Crossref , the team that causes the uncontested scrum may not replace the player who caused it , so they must play with 8 forwards and 6 backs ?

Just to clarify Crossref , the team that causes the uncontested scrum may not replace the player who caused it , so they must play with 8 forwards and 6 backs ?

I can't find this in the 2018 law book , not covered by Laws 3 or 19 , I know it was part of last years Global trials , but are we still playing to it and if so which law covers it ?

I can't find this in the 2018 law book , not covered by Laws 3 or 19 , I know it was part of last years Global trials , but are we still playing to it and if so which law covers it ?

On further scrutiny I think you’re right becket , it was a near charge down and the referee clearly warns the players in front not to advance !

On further scrutiny I think you’re right becket , it was a near charge down and the referee clearly warns the players in front not to advance !

Clermont v Saracens 17/12. In 30th minute Clermont kicked downfield , ball was half charged down by Sarries player and carried on into Sarries 22 , Sarries fielded and were able to kick direct into touch . Wasn't the ball taken in by Sarries due to the half charge down ?

Clermont v Saracens 17/12. In 30th minute Clermont kicked downfield , ball was half charged down by Sarries player and carried on into Sarries 22 , Sarries fielded and were able to kick direct into touch . Wasn't the ball taken in by Sarries due to the half charge down ?

If the player was already in touch when he jumped and the ball crosses the plane before he knocks it back, then even if he was in mid air he is still in touch , so to me it should be his teams throw in, as both player and ball were clearly in touch . If he had taken off inside the field of play...

If the player was already in touch when he jumped and the ball crosses the plane before he knocks it back, then even if he was in mid air he is still in touch , so to me it should be his teams throw in, as both player and ball were clearly in touch . If he had taken off inside the field of play...

Qu 1 Should read ''being over the ball '' ! Typo !

Qu 1 Should read ''being over the ball '' ! Typo !

Two questions 1. Does being ''over the tackled player'' actually start the ruck from a defender's point of view , allowing for the fact that the ball maybe placed a good arms length behind the tackled player , possibly a metre away from the tackler ,so he / she is not over it yet ? 2. When the...

Two questions 1. Does being ''over the tackled player'' actually start the ruck from a defender's point of view , allowing for the fact that the ball maybe placed a good arms length behind the tackled player , possibly a metre away from the tackler ,so he / she is not over it yet ? 2. When the...

No . Ken Owens was running back and CAUGHT the ball , his choice , at what stage of the split second did he decide to drop it ? He was better placed than anyone to see who played the ball first and should have left it as he was in front of his own man .

No . Ken Owens was running back and CAUGHT the ball , his choice , at what stage of the split second did he decide to drop it ? He was better placed than anyone to see who played the ball first and should have left it as he was in front of his own man .

Is the shoulder part of the arm ? If not then no knock on . However Williams still played the ball and Owens interfered with play, from an offside position therefore PK . I think Poite was trying to avoid a Craig Joubert moment ! AB's rightly annoyed as it as clearly one of their ''go to''...

Is the shoulder part of the arm ? If not then no knock on . However Williams still played the ball and Owens interfered with play, from an offside position therefore PK . I think Poite was trying to avoid a Craig Joubert moment ! AB's rightly annoyed as it as clearly one of their ''go to''...

Attacker kicks the ball which unintentionally ricochets off a defender ,for example a forward still in the scrum . Ball travels into In goal and is touched down .Is it still a Scrum 5 , even though defender didn't intentionally send ball into his in goal ?

Attacker kicks the ball which unintentionally ricochets off a defender ,for example a forward still in the scrum . Ball travels into In goal and is touched down .Is it still a Scrum 5 , even though defender didn't intentionally send ball into his in goal ?