Recent content by ChuckieB

  1. C

    [6N] Tmo farce

    Embarrasment for whom?
  2. C

    [6N] Tmo farce

    Embarrasment for whom?
  3. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    You can't have half a maul nor can you apply two different sets of differing criteria to police it. That would not be consistent application of the laws. but if a maul is over when the ball itself is on or over the goal line then all bets are off. so you are left with a maul that the ball is...
  4. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    You can't have half a maul nor can you apply two different sets of differing criteria to police it. That would not be consistent application of the laws. but if a maul is over when the ball itself is on or over the goal line then all bets are off. so you are left with a maul that the ball is...
  5. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    2017 - If a player rejoins the maul in front of the hind most team-mate in the maul they are offside. 2018 - I am happy to accept that if the laws are not deemed to have changed that there is an offside line which may not be the hind most foot, but, only for players who are not trying to...
  6. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    2017 - If a player rejoins the maul in front of the hind most team-mate in the maul they are offside. 2018 - I am happy to accept that if the laws are not deemed to have changed that there is an offside line which may not be the hind most foot, but, only for players who are not trying to...
  7. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    I have it that they must join the maul in the normal way from behind the hind most foot, but can still bind alongside as long as they bind to that player, and if the maul extends into the in goal they do not have to retire if they are not joining. This allows them complete freedom to pounce...
  8. C

    [Maul] Maul - Legal collapse

    I have it that they must join the maul in the normal way from behind the hind most foot, but can still bind alongside as long as they bind to that player, and if the maul extends into the in goal they do not have to retire if they are not joining. This allows them complete freedom to pounce...
  9. C

    [Law] on your Mark's

    it was raised as a discussion point in a super rugby game last season when the mark was not given because while he had his foot behind, he clearly had caught it in front of the line. Under the circumstances I am going to give it. As far as taken back in decisions, I am following the law trials...
  10. C

    [Law] on your Mark's

    it was raised as a discussion point in a super rugby game last season when the mark was not given because while he had his foot behind, he clearly had caught it in front of the line. Under the circumstances I am going to give it. As far as taken back in decisions, I am following the law trials...
  11. C

    [Law] on your Mark's

    E From a mark perspective no, but were we to have to consider it from a from a "taken back in" perspective, then yes.
  12. C

    [Law] on your Mark's

    E From a mark perspective no, but were we to have to consider it from a from a "taken back in" perspective, then yes.
  13. C

    [6N] Tmo farce

    In the context of the thought process and the laws I can understand the outcome. If we are debating it here: was it grounded, was it under control,, etc...., it is not that clear and obvious and the outcome via the laws was correct. I think of those moments when a ball is most probably...
  14. C

    [6N] Tmo farce

    In the context of the thought process and the laws I can understand the outcome. If we are debating it here: was it grounded, was it under control,, etc...., it is not that clear and obvious and the outcome via the laws was correct. I think of those moments when a ball is most probably...
  15. C

    2 questions: Pushing players over and being off your feet to pass

    It's u10 and you should be looking for a reason to play on and provide the necessary coaching to improve their skills and understanding. even materiality has little significance at this level.